So for full cabin pictures, see my previous first class review. Other planes have two rows of first class in a configuration, while the has three rows lufthaansa a configuration, with two center seats in the last row. I assigned the two center seats for us. Lufthansa first class As soon as we were settled in, a flight attendant came by to offer us pre-departure beverages revoew choice. We both ordered champagne and sparkling water, which came with some mixed nuts rather than the macadamia nuts we were offered on the outbound. Lufthansa first class — amenities Boarding was quick, and by 1PM it was announced that boarding was complete, with every seat on the plane taken.
At PM the safety video was screened, but we ended up only pushing back at PM, due to congestion around our gate. Lufthansa first class cabin Once we pushed back our taxi was quick, and by PM we were cleared for takeoff on runway 7C. Lufthansa airshow enroute to Boston The seatbelt sign was turned off just five minutes after takeoff, and a few minutes later the purser passed through the cabin lufthanda welcome aboard first class passengers and distribute cards for free wifi.
Around the same time flight attendants offered warm towels. Lufthansa first class warm towel and free wifi code The meal service began just 20 minutes after takeoff. The lunch menu read as follows: The drink list read as follows: Tablecloths were distributed, along with the amuse bouche. Since I was planning on working the entire flight given see more it was a Tuesday and I had wifiI just had a glass of water.
Lufthansa first class lunch — amuse bouche Next up the silverware, bread, salt and pepper shaker, and olive oil, were distributed. Lufthansa first class lunch — first class butter First a cart was rolled through the cabin with caviar. Rather than giving each passenger their own small tin, Lufthansa plates the caviar out of a larger tin. I also had some delicious garlic bread and toast. Lufthansa first class lunch — appetizers Next up was a palate cleanser. Lufthansa first class lunch — palate cleanser For the main course my dad had the fried chicken flavored with truffle, wild broccoli and warm potato salad.
Lufthansa first class lunch — main course Then my dad had a cheese course for dessert. Lufthansa first class lunch — dessert Overall I thought the meal was pretty good, though I think at times Lufthansa just tries too hard with their menu, and I wish they had a simpler selection.
The meal was done about 2hr30min into the flight. As far as the service goes, I found the crew was professional and attentive, as usual in Lufthansa first class.
Tips and advice when you review a scientific paper Published by Bestoun S. Over the past seven years, I have reviewed more than scientific papers custom made paper plates my field. Second, you know what others do in research, hence, the review broadens your scope. Third, I see this review process as a public service. I tried my best to help authors to improve their works by giving useful feedback, and I hope others look as critical and constructive to my own work. Recently, I have tried to record some of them on publons.
Check out my account on publons, here. I got many certificates, appreciations, and awards for my reviews and feedbacks for those papers I reviewed. Over these years, my experience in the review has been improved gradually. Of course, you may know this already, but I reach it by experience. Now, I can confirm that my first review in is not like my review a few days ago. Over the time, you become scienrific stable and able to give wise advice. Combining all these reasons, I decided to write down those points that I recognized during this time and put them all together to form some informal guidelines from my experience.
I will categorize them into three categories, 1 Accepting a paper to review, 2 Reviewing a paper, and 3 Submitting a review. I will update these guidelines from time to time when I recognize some new issues. Accepting a paper to review This stage is when you get an invitation to review and you have to accept or decline it. When you accept a paper out of your scope, most probably, your judgment will not scientific publications review article fair. Besides, you will spend longer time to understand and review.
Accepting a paper out of your scope will lead to delay in the review process also. If you have a conflict of interest with one of the authors, never even accept this paper to review. This may also harm your reputation in the future if the editor knows that without informing him. If you feel that you cannot finish the paper within one month and a half this is my timing suggestion, it is not standarddecline the review.
Sometimes, this review is just a procedure, and they will accept the paper even when you reject it. Reviewing a paper This stage is the actual review stage when you accepted the invitation to review. Be responsible and do it in time.
Seek input from your team members to ensure the agenda reflects their needs and keeps them engaged. Another tactic for creating a better meeting agenda is listing topics as questions to be answered. And indicate on the agenda who is leading each discussion so they can prepare. These tips, and five others, will help your team stay focused in meetings. These problems — and others like it — business review meeting pdf from poor agenda design. An effective agenda sets clear expectations for what needs to occur before and during a meeting. It helps team members prepare, allocates time wisely, quickly gets everyone on the same topic, and identifies when the discussion is complete.
You and Your Team Meetings How to make them more productive. Here are some tips for designing an effective agenda for your next meeting, with a sample agenda and template below. If you want your team to be engaged in meetings, make sure the agenda includes items that reflect their needs.
Ask team members to suggest agenda items along with a reason why each item needs to be addressed in a team setting. If you ultimately decide not to include an item, be accountable — explain your reasoning to the team member who suggested it. Select topics that affect the entire team. Team meeting time is expensive and difficult to schedule. It should mainly be used to discuss and make decisions on issues that affect the whole team — and need the whole team to solve them.
These are often ones in which individuals must coordinate their actions because their parts of the organization are interdependent. They are also likely to be issues for which people have different information and needs. Examples might include: How do we best allocate shared resources. How do we reduce response time.
The minimum standards are all subject to peer review processes. The mechanics of the peer review process were not included as part of the final reports on these Actions. Instead, the OECD indicated at the time of the release of the BEPS final reports that it would, at a later stage, issue peer review documents on these Actions providing the terms of reference and the methodology by which the peer reviews would be conducted.
The Assessment Methodology provided procedures for undertaking a peer review and monitoring in two stages. Input is provided through questionnaires completed by the assessed jurisdiction, peers i. Each of these parts addresses a different component of the minimum standard. The eight reports include over recommendations relating to the minimum standard. In general, the performance of the relevant countries with regards to MAP has been scored as satisfactory in their respective reports.
The majority of the countries assessed have mechanisms to prevent disputes from arising, and when disputes occur, they have an established MAP program. Also, regarding application and time, the average time taken for resolving MAP cases is in general satisfactory, and MAP agreements reached so far have been implemented on time.
Regarding the prevention of disputes, all assessed countries, but Portugal, meet this key area of the minimum standard. The best practice reports are divided into the same four parts as the peer review reports. However, for most of the best practices, the peers provided only limited input. The OECD is currently working on the peer reviews reports for the fifth and sixth batch of jurisdictions. While increased scrutiny and subjectivity is expected to significantly increase the risk of double taxation, the fact that tax authorities may be subject to review by their peers should be seen by MNEs as a positive step that will increase the likelihood of access to an effective and timely MAP process.
Furthermore, the peer review reports provide insights to taxpayers on the availability and efficacy of MAP in the countries under review. With additional countries continuing to be reviewed, the OECD has made it known that taxpayer input oecd peer review action 14 to be welcomed on an ongoing basis..
Share on Pinterest It seems like everyone is praising the keto diet these days. The keto diet requires adhering to an extremely low-carb, high-fat diet in order to put your body into a metabolic state called ketosis. This makes your body more efficient at burning fat. In recent weeks, the keto diet has been in the news because some experts say it can cause changes in libido. Nancy P. While the libido warning keeto a lot of notoriety in the media, actual research confirming this side effect was hard to come by.
Click at this page, there are some side effects, that are well known and that medical review of keto diet aspiring keto dieter can get ready for. Get ready for the keto flu Most people didt know about the keto flu, which can happen when you reviea the diet. Lowering carb intake forces the body to burn ketones for energy instead of glucose.
Once the body is in ketosis — burning fat instead of glucose — the keto diet is working. But diiet may not feel so great at first, hence the term keto flu. Symptoms of the keto flu can include everything from headache, weakness, and irritability, to constipation, nausea, and vomiting. This may lead to dehydration and flu-like symptoms, such as fatigue, dizziness, irritability, nausea, and muscle soreness. In addition, as carbohydrates are a source of energy and stimulation, removal of this source of energy will result in increased sugar cravings, brain fog, [and] difficulty concentrating, much like most other withdrawal symptoms.
This may put the dieter at risk of a cardiac arrhythmia, as electrolytes are necessary for the normal beating of the heart, Rahnama added. Yo-yo dieting patterns The keto diet can also lead to yo-yo dieting, because people have difficulty staying on the restrictive diet permanently.
Sample paper formatted on Typeset - typeset This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here. It is a very innovative solution physicsl the formatting physical review fluids impact factor and existing providers such as Word did not really evolve in recent years. Templates work perfectly on my initial testing. I work in a research lab and it is great to format my papers so quick so easily. I do not have to look up guidelines, I can just write my draft and be ready to submit.
Godsent for physical review fluids impact factor who do not know LaTeX. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of physical review fluids impact factor respective owners. Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. PRFluids embraces revisw traditional fluid dynamics topics and newer areas, such as bio-related fluid dynamics, micro- and nanoscale flows, fluid mechanics of complex fluids and soft materials, and geophysical and environmental flows.
Read Less Physical Review Fluids PRFluids is dedicated to publishing innovative research that will significantly advance the fundamental understanding of fluid dynamics. PRFluids embraces both traditional fluid dynamics topics and newer areas, such as bio-related fluid dynamics, micro.
Step 5: Close your browser in rfview after landing on 3 or 4 such sites not knowing what to do about buying the product or not. Does this sounds familiar. It does to me, yet I actually have done that for a revoew and if you it product review template Health Ambition a bit and look at some of our reviews from a few years ago you will see we were playing that exact game. But with every downturn there is an opportunity. We have cleared the board, forgotten everything we knew about writing reviews and looked around to try and learn from the best.
Here are some of our earnings generated ONLY it product review template reviews. In this post we will be sharing the format we use to write those reviews and earn great commissions on affiliate products. The 8 steps on how to write a product review. The psychological principles of persuasion that help you sell more without looking salesy.
How preselling is stronger than selling. How to format reviews for maximum efficiency. This summary box is one of templage best if sections on our page. Same for some of the reviews on Health Ambition. An ideal summary should at least have the following six elements: A short sentence identifying the product and its intended use. Product ratings under different headers. Make these visual by using icons. Important to throw in the cons otherwise your review will feel biased.
A summary of the review. Keep produch limited to paragraphs. A CTA. Use actionable copy on the CTA text. The product price, since many of your readers will decide to buy or not based on this factor alone. This specific box was built with the elements available out of the box with Thrive Content builder, you should be able to recreate it quite easily with it.
Such reviews are a dime a dozen online, and usually do a miserable job of helping readers. What they want is to learn whether temlate product can actually solve their problems.
It allows PDF version of manuscripts that have been peer reviewed and accepted, to be hosted online prior to their inclusion in a final printed journal. Readers can freely access or cite the article. We aim to publish accepted manuscripts in e-Version First in two magazinw time after the final draft completed. Please see the workflow for the article publication: Paper Selection geview Publication Process a. Upon receipt of paper submission, the Editorial Assistant sends an E-mail of confirmation to the corresponding international business review magazine within working days.
Please contact the Editor in time for that. Peer review. The paper will be peer-reviewed by three experts; two reviewers from outside and one editor from the journal typically involve in reviewing a submission. The review process may take weeks. Notification of the result of review by E-mail. If the submission is accepted, the authors revise accordingly and pay publication fee USD. From July 1,we will not automatically provide authors free print journals. We will provide free print copies for authors who really need them. Authors are requested to kindly fill an application form to request free print copies.
This is the same as the printed version.